M. Lindheim & Co. v. Central National Realty & Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, the Centra,! National Realty and Con- . st ruction Company and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and' entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 15th day of January, 1906, denying the defendants’- motion to cancel the notice o.f pendency of action herein. • ;
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, J. :. Section 1670 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that “ in an action brought to recover a judgment- affecting the title to or the possession, use or enjoyment of real property * * * the plaintiff may * * * file in' the clerk’s office of each county where the property is situated a notice of the pendency of the action * *
An analysis of the complaint discloses that the defendant Signell, being the owner of a certain piece of real estate in the borough of Manhattan, desired to exchange said property for certain lots in the borough of Brooklyn, and, in consideration of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mills v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Beman v. . ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. Santa Clara Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Brox v. RikerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Richards v. ChubaNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Behrens v. SturgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Keating v. HammersteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Hercules Chemical Co. v. VCI, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983
- Metz v. Forest Hills Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.