Legal Opinion
Metz v. Forest Hills Homes, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.
The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract on July 19,1948, to purchase certain real property upon which the defendant was to construct a building in accordance with certain plans and specifications. On May 16, 1949, the plaintiff instituted an action against the defendant containing two counts predicated upon fraud. The “ wherefore ” clause sought the rescission of the contract, the payment with interest of $19,750 which the plaintiff had paid to the defendant, the additional sum of $10,000 as damages, and that6 ‘ Plaintiff have such other and further relief as to this Court may…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Niagara Falls Power Co. v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Red Robin Stores, Inc. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Interboro Operating Corp. v. Commonwealth Security & Mortgage Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Sorenson v. Keesey Hosiery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Drydock Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Queens Machine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country ClubHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Reed v. Sixth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- Raben v. Overseas Barters, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Schuman v. O'DayNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Sobieski v. North Division Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.