Hayward v. Manzer
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order refusing'a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
plaintiff, Hayward, brought an action to recover damages for trespass committed, as he alleged, by defendants, the marshal and board of trustees of the town of Hayward. He complained that they had un*477lawfully intruded upon his land, and torn down his fences, cut down and dug up his trees, and threw open his land for use as a public highway of that town. He prayed for damages against them for the acts of trespass committed, and for a perpetual injunction to prevent them and their successors, etc., from the commission of' further acts of that nature.
The cause was tried by the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- City of San Francisco v. CalderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Fassett v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Tate v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by13 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Gardner v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Brown v. BachelderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.