Koeber v. Apex-Albuq Phoenix Express
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NOBLE, Justice.
Apex-Albuq Phoenix Express has appealed from a judgment restraining and enjoining it from constructing, operating or maintaining a truck terminal at the premises known as 7423 Edith Boulevard, N.E. in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Thirty-one findings of fact were adopted by the trial court, including No. 14-
“14. That the entire operation of defendant’s present and proposed truck terminal amounts to a nuisance in fact and a nuisance per se.”
While many other findings are attacked as being unsupported by the evidence, and even though four points have been asserted as error, we think…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Templeton v. Pecos Valley Artesian Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Davis v. MerrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Cochran v. GordonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Phillips v. AllinghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. State Ex Rel. Village of Los Ranchos De AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- Scott v. JordanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State ex rel. Village of Los Ranchos de Albuquerque v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Board of County Com'rs of Dona Ana County v. LittleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Garcia v. Color Tile Distributing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.