Legal Opinion

State v. LATALL

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 16, 2008No. SC 89322PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Judge.

Introduction

Robert Latall’s appeal of his misdemeanor nonsupport conviction raises the question of whether Latall “injected the issue” of good cause, within the meaning of the statute, thus requiring the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he lacked good cause in failing to pay child support.

This is a criminal case. Unlike a civil action for child support, the criminal statute places a burden on the state to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The question of whether Latall injected the good cause issue into the case is an issue of law. From this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SladekSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. State v. StrubbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. State v. HelmigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. State v. DegraffenreidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Luis Zetina-TorresSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. State of Missouri v. Christopher C. ClaycombSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. State of Missouri v. Thomas A. EssSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  5. State v. NaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API