Legal Opinion

State v. Vickers

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2018No. WD 80148PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4. Prejudice

"Generally, prejudice must be 'actual prejudice apparent on the record or by reasonable inference-not speculative or possible prejudice.' " Garcia , 316 S.W.3d at 912 (quoting State v. Edwards , 750 S.W.2d 438, 442 (Mo. banc 1988) ). "More recently, however, the United States Supreme Court allowed a speedy trial claim to stand absent particularized prejudice." Id. (citing Doggett v. United States , 505 U.S. 647, 112 S.Ct. 2686, 120 L.Ed.2d 520 (1992) ). "Negligence, the Supreme Court said, is not 'automatically tolerable simply because the accused cannot demonstrate exactly how it…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. EatonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Leroy W. Coleman, Jr. v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. STATE OF MISSOURI v. JONATHAN G. NEWTONMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. WILLIAM HENRY IIIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State of Missouri v. Abraham J. GilbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API