State v. Chakerian
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentZamora, J.
I agree that Section 66-8-109(B), as written, does not provide a defendant with a meaningful opportunity to arrange for and effectuate the timely performance of an independent chemical test. However, it is a function of our Legislature to make it so and revise the statute accordingly. For these reasons, I respectfully dissent.
The issue before this Court is whether providing Defendant with the Yellow Pages phone book and access to a telephone for a period of twenty to thirty minutes in the early hours of the morning meant that Defendantwas given a reasonable, as opposed to meaningful,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Marbob Energy Corp. v. New Mexico Oil Conservation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Miller v. New Mexico Department of TransportationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Commonwealth v. AlanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.