Legal Opinion
Tank Connection, LLC v. Haight
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 8, 2016No. Case No. 6:13-cv-01392-JTMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. THOMAS MARTEN, JUDGE
Plaintiff Tank Connection, LLC, brought this action against a former employee, John Haight, claiming that when *959Haight left its employment and went to work for a competitor he improperly took confidential information from Tank Connection’s computer files. Plaintiff asserts claims for breach of contract, violation of the Kansas Uniform Trade Secrets Act, breach of a common law duty of loyalty, and violation of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1030. Haight denies the allegations. The matter is now before the court on Haight’s motion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lifewise Master Funding v. TelebankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Central Bank & Trust v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2016
- AlixPartners, LLP and AlixPartners Holdings, LLP v. David BenichouCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019
- Applied Medical Distribution Corp. v. JarrellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Yazam v. D.C. Department of For-Hire VehiclesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024