Legal Opinion

Swackhammer v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1984No. Appeals, Nos. 309 C.D. 1983, 1025 C.D. 1983 and 1212 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Williams, Jr.,

Russell L. Swaekhammer, Hazel D. Ellenberger and Cynthia Lynn Floravit (Claimants) appeal from Unemployment Compensation Board of Review decisions which affirmed a referee’s determinations that Claimants were financially ineligible for benefits under Section 404 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1

The sole question is whether workmen’s compensation benefit payments were improperly excluded *295from the calculation of base year wages for the purposes of determining Claimants’ financial eligibility for unemployment compensation. To qualify for unemployment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Karamanian v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Beistle Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coates v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Richards v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Whitling v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Logan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Alla v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API