Beistle Co. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
This is an appeal by The Beistle Company from the decision and order of the Unemployment Compensa*206tion Board of Review (Board) which affirmed the decision of a referee granting partial unemployment compensation benefits to Malgram Jones, Jr. (Claimant) . Fox the reasons which follow, the order of the Board is affirmed.
The facts are not in dispute. Claimant, who was employed as a machine operator for Beistle, had a regular work schedule of four, nine-hour shifts, Monday through Thursday. From December 21, 1979 through January 6, 1980, Claimant did not work. Claimant’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Hock v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Whitling v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Colello v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Swackhammer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Ludlum v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991