Legal Opinion

Logan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 10, 2014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.

Wendi Logan (Claimant) petitions for review, pro se, of the March 11, 2014, order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR) reversing a referee’s decision and concluding that Claimant is financially ineligible for unemployment compensation (UC) benefits. We affirm.

Claimant began working for The Gap, Inc., (Employer) in 1999. Claimant suffered a work-related injury in June 2009 but continued to work. Employer’s store permanently closed in December 2009, and Claimant applied for UC benefits pursuant to the Unemployment Compensation Law (UC Law).1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pagliei v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Lewis v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Swackhammer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. A. Zhukov v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. J. Snak v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. M.J. Neal v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. R.E. Rodgers v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API