Legal Opinion

Spiegel v. Babbit

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 1, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-0728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPORKIN, District Judge.

Before this Court are Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Based on the record and oral argument, the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted and the Plaintiffs Motion for a Preliminary Injunction will be denied.

I. The Facts

Defendants maintain a park area along the Potomac riverfront in the District of Columbia called Georgetown Waterfront Park, part of which includes the Washington Harbour. Georgetown Waterfront Park is part of the C & O Canal National Historic Park,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Marymount Hospital, Inc. v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, HhsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. CarterDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheets v. CTS Wireless Components, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2002
  2. Mashack v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Ft. Funston Dog Walkers v. BabbittDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API