Legal Opinion

Pavoni v. Nielsen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 16, 2000No. 990179-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

¶ 1 Justin and Kimberly Pavoni appeal the trial court’s grant of a directed verdict in favor of defendant Michael Nielsen, and the resulting attorney fee award to Nielsen as the prevailing party under an indemnity agreement. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

¶2 On review of a directed verdict, “we ‘examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the losing party.’ ” Fibro Trust, Inc. v. Brahman Fin., Inc., 1999 UT 13, ¶ 13, 974 P.2d 288 (quoting Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc., 812 P.2d 49, 57 (Utah 1991)). We recite the facts accordingly.

¶3 In the spring of 1992, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brehany v. Nordstrom, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mahmood v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Continental Heller v. AMTECH MECHANICAL SERV.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Sawyers v. FMA Leasing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Gilbert v. InceUtah Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  2. Martinez v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  3. Free Motion Fitness, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank West, NACourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  4. United States v. BrintonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2012
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland v. Goran, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API