Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Ince

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1999No. 970392PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

¶ 1 Plaintiff Cyndi W. Gilbert appeals from a verdict in favor of defendants Paul R. Inee and the law firm of Callister, Nebeker & McCullough. Gilbert brought suit against defendants, alleging they had wrongfully used civil proceedings in filing and maintaining a malpractice action against her. The trial court conducted a jury trial and, at the conclusion of Gilbert’s case in chief, granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Cyndi Gilbert is an attorney, as was Paul R. Ince at the time the relevant events in this case occurred. Ince was a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Foote v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Becker v. KrollCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Roska v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Roska v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  5. Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API