Gilbert v. Ince
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Justice:
¶ 1 Plaintiff Cyndi W. Gilbert appeals from a verdict in favor of defendants Paul R. Inee and the law firm of Callister, Nebeker & McCullough. Gilbert brought suit against defendants, alleging they had wrongfully used civil proceedings in filing and maintaining a malpractice action against her. The trial court conducted a jury trial and, at the conclusion of Gilbert’s case in chief, granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Cyndi Gilbert is an attorney, as was Paul R. Ince at the time the relevant events in this case occurred. Ince was a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Leigh Furniture and Carpet Co. v. IsomUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Hodges v. Gibson Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Foote v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Becker v. KrollCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Roska v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Roska v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Anderson Development Co. v. TobiasUtah Supreme Court · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.