Legal Opinion
State v. Penn
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1991No. 90-859PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
Section 14, Article I of the Ohio Constitution provides as follows:
“The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and possessions, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person and things to be seized.”
In Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc. (1978), 436 U.S. 307, 311-312, 98 S.Ct. 1816, 1820, 56 L.Ed.2d 305, 311, the high court stated as follows:
“The Warrant Clause of the Fourth Amendment protects commercial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Joseph Riley v. Frank H. Gray, Supt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stone v. City of StowOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WelchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Cleveland v. BergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.