Boettler v. Tendick
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from. Bexar. Tried below before Hon. Geo. H. ¡Noonan.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Chief Justice.—
Appellant constructed a stone building for appellee under a contract which contained full specifications of the work to be done and of the character of the material to be used, all of which was to be furnished by the appellant.
The plans and specifications were prepared by architects in the employment of appellee, and the contract contains the following agreement.-
"Sixth. It is furthermore agreed between the contracting parties-, hereto that the said Wahrenberger & Beckmann are the architects under whose supervision, directions, and control the said materials are to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kihlberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sweeney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- East Alabama Railway Co. v. Doe Ex Dem. VisscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by48 opinions
- Cantrell v. Woodhill Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Hanley v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Totten v. HoughtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Boston Store v. SchleuterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.