Legal Opinion

Dam, Snell and Taveirne, Ltd. v. Verchota

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 10, 2001No. 2 — 01—0315PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger

Defendant Mary Seda, a/k/a Mary Miller (Miller), appeals from the February 27, 2001, order of the circuit court of Lake County entering a preliminary injunction preventing her from performing any accounting services on behalf of the clients of her former employer, plaintiff Dam, Snell and Taveirne, Ltd. (DST). On appeal, Miller argues that (1) the restrictive covenant contained in her employment agreement was invalid as a matter of law; and (2) the trial court abused its discretion in entering the preliminary injunction. We affirm.

The facts relevant to the instant appeal are as follows. DST…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dixon Ass'n for Retarded Citizens v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Booth v. GreberAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Office Mates 5, North Shore, Inc. v. HazenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Wolf & Co. v. WaldronAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Arpac Corp. v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. RELIABLE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. v. ArredondoIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Sadler v. CreekmurAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Hot Light Brands, L.L.C. v. Harris Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. EhlersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. Reliable Fire Equipment Co. v. ArredondoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API