Legal Opinion
Arpac Corp. v. Murray
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 11, 1992No. 1-91-2584PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice DiVITO
Plaintiff Arpac Corporation (Arpac) sought injunctive and other relief from its former employee, defendant Charles Murray, based upon Murray’s employment agreement containing a restrictive covenant. After an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court entered a preliminary injunction, enjoining Murray and Bundling Machines International, Inc. (BMI), his current employer, from soliciting any of Arpac’s customers of the previous five years for a period of 24 months. The court further enjoined Murray from influencing Arpac’s employees to leave the company and from working in Arpac’s area of business…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- House of Vision, Inc. v. HiyaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- McRand, Inc. v. Van BeelenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Corroon & Black of Illinois, Inc. v. MagnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Wessel Co. v. BusaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Hamer Holding Group, Inc. v. ElmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Cambridge Engineering, Inc. v. Mercury Partners 90 BI, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Lawrence & Allen, Inc. v. Cambridge Human Resource Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Baxter International, Inc., Baxter Healthcare Corp., Baxter Diagnostics, Inc. v. Roger J. Morris, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Eichmann v. National Hospital & Health Care Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Abbott-Interfast Corp. v. HarkabusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.