Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Tifton Guano Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1917No. 7994PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Money rule'; from city court of Tifton—Judge Eve. November 21, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

On January 4, 1915, Weatherington executed a note to Eeynolds for $2,000, payable November 1 after date, and, to secure its payment, executed a mortgage on certain live stock described therein as “seven head of mules and horses.” On May 17 of the same year he executed and delivered to the Tifton Guano Company two promissory notes, one for $162.94, due September 1 after date, and one for $718.15, due October 1 after date. On November 9,1915, the Tifton Guano Company sued out an attachment against Weatherington, alleging that he was indebted to it in the sum of $836.09, and the attachment was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. A. S. Thomas Furniture Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Stewart v. JaquesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. First National Bank v. SpicerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  4. Nussbaum v. Waterman & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Cambridge Tile Co. v. Scaife & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bennett v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Barber v. Housing Authority of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Mitchell v. Shepherd Mall State BankDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Cairo Banking Co. v. Citizens BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Adkins v. SalmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API