Legal Opinion

Weinbeck v. Dahms

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 24, 1919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court. (Duffy, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Oourt.

1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.

This is an action of ejectment brought by the appellee claiming as a tenant in common to the extent of a one-third interest in a lot on Dillon street.

The supposed right of the plaintiff, appellee here, arises out of a deed executed on the 21st of April, 1913, by Anna Dahms, of the property in question on Dillon street. The granting’ clause of the deed was in the following language:

“Witnesseth, That in consideration of the sum of five dollars and other good and valuable considerations, the said Anna Dahms doth grant and convey unto Gertrude C. Dahms, Irwin E. Dahms and Anna Dahins, minors…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bassett v. BudlongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Baldwin v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  3. Zittle v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  4. Second Universalist Society v. DuganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  5. Robinson v. PayneMississippi Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hodges v. OwingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  2. Neavitt v. LightnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  3. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  4. Beranek v. CaccimaiciCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  5. Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API