Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1985No. C8-84-1549PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Respondent Otto William Schultz appealed an order denying all driving privileges pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 171.04(8) (1984). The Commissioner of Public Safety denied respondent’s motion for reinstatement of his driving privileges. He appealed to the district court which remanded the matter to the Commissioner to consider additional evidence submitted by respondent. The district court strongly recommended that respondent be allowed a limited license for work purposes.

On remand the Commissioner again denied respondent’s request and required five years verified total…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McIntee v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Hintz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Antl v. State, Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Krakowski v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mechtel v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Stavlo v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Sullivan v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Larson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Phillippe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API