Legal Opinion
Krakowski v. City of St. Cloud
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 11, 1960No. 37,689PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nelson, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court affirming dismissal of appellant as a classified civil service employee of the city of St. Cloud by the Civil Service Board of said city.
The following facts are not in dispute: Appellant, Konstanty J. Kralcowski, was an employee of the city of St. Cloud. His employment covered a period of some 30 years during which he had largely been assigned to the Department of Parks. On September 19, 1956, he was notified by a letter from the mayor’s administrative assistant that he was discharged from employment for having violated Rule 901.1 of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Ry. Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sellin v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Hunstiger v. KilianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- People Ex Rel. Polen v. HoehlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Foesch v. Independent School District No. 646Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Antl v. State, Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Keller v. Independent School District No. 742Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Schultz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Coudron v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.