Legal Opinion

Mailhot v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 29, 1999No. AC 18422PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPALLONE, J.

This appeal is taken after an administrative department of motor vehicles per se hearing and from the trial court’s judgment dismissing the appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*63The plaintiff, Steven M. Mailhot, challenged the decision of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner) suspending the plaintiffs motor vehicle operator’s license for refusing to submit to a chemical test of his breath or urine pursuant to General Statutes § 14-227b (c).1 The hearing officer found the issues in favor of the defendant, including a finding that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. SpearsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Red 11, LLC v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Winsor v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Adams v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Lomen v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API