Legal Opinion
Ogborn v. City of Lancaster
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 2002No. B150712PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, J.
Plaintiffs Craig and Kayla Ogborn sued the City of Lancaster (City) and individual city officials for various claims arising out of the City’s demolition of their rented home and its contents as part of a nuisance abatement program. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants on the ground of qualified governmental immunity. We reverse the judgment in part and affirm in part.
Factual and Procedural Background
The Ogborns lived in a rented white stucco house on a 10-acre parcel in the City. The owner of the property, Donald Miller, Sr., also lived on the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cousins v. LockyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Venegas v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- O'TOOLE v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Young v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Conway v. County of TuolumneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.