Legal Opinion
Conway v. County of Tuolumne
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 2014No. F067505PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
OLIVER, J. *
In an unsuccessful attempt to apprehend George P. Conway’s adult son, Donald Conway, 1 who reportedly had fired shots at George, officers from defendant County of Tuolumne (County) fired a tear gas canister into George’s mobilehome. Donald was not inside but was apprehended later. George brought suit against the County for damage to his mobilehome caused by the tear gas, alleging negligence, trespass, nuisance, and strict liability for an ultrahazardous activity. The trial court granted the County’s motion for summary judgment, finding the County immune under Government…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Caldwell v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tiffany Tabares v. City of Huntington BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Buckhalter v. City of VacavilleDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Cory Mac A Ghobhainn v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- David Jessen v. County of FresnoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Estate of Xander Mann v. County of StanislausDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.