Dyer v. Sears, Roebuck & Company

I am not in accord with the opinion of Mr. Justice Black, either as to the construction of the 1954 amendment or that plaintiff’s injury arose out of and during the- course of her employment.

Whether the act has retroactive effect to include injuries occurring prior to the effective date-of the act need not be decided in this case as the act clearly relates to employees going to or from work. It does not include injuries to persons going upon- a personal errand not in any way connected with his or her work.

My Brother relies upon Haller v. City of Lansing, 195 Mich 753 (LRA1917E, 324), to…