Legal Opinion

Tallevast v. Kaminski

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 13, 1928No. 12468PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

The purpose of this action, instituted in the Court of Common Pleas of Georgetown County, was to obtain a permanent restraining order against the defendants, as to the matters set forth in the complaint. In view of the full and clear agreed statement of the case appearing in the transcript, we adopt the same as the statement of the Court, namely:

“This action was commenced by plaintiff on behalf of himself and all other taxpayers of the County of Georgetown who may come in and contribute to the expense of this action, for the purpose…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. South Carolina Education Ass'n v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Kennedy v. South Carolina Retirement SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. City of Spokane v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Greenville Baseball, Inc. v. Bearden, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API