Autodesk, Inc. v. Kobayashi + Zedda Architects Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Kobayashi + Zedda Architects Ltd., dba KZA (“Defendant”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Autodesk, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) copyright infringement action for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule?’) 12(b)(2), improper venue under Rule 12(b)(3), and failure to state a claim upon *1012which relief can be granted under Rule 12(b)(6). Dkt. No, 21. Plaintiff filed an Opposition (Dkt. No. 26), and Defendant filed a Reply (Dkt. No. 33). The Court finds this matter suitable for…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Avaya Inc. v. PearceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Syntronic ABDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Doe v. Deutsche Lufthansa AktiengesellschaftDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Facebook, Inc. v. OnLineNic IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Garland v. Dunkin Donuts LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.