Doe v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JOHN DOE and ROBERT ROE, Case No. 23-cv-04413-SI 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS FOR LACK 11 v. OF PERSONAL JURSIDICTION AND UNSEALING DOCKET NOS. 16-1 AND 12 DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 17-1 AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, et al., 13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17 Defendants. 14 15 On March 22, 2024, the Court held a hearing on defendants’ motions to dismiss for lack of 16 personal jurisdiction, or in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth 17 below, the Court GRANTS defendants’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.