Legal Opinion
Dotster, Inc. v. INTERNET CORP. FOR ASSIG. NAMES & NUM.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 12, 2003No. CV 03-5045-JFW(MANx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WALTER, District Judge.
On September 8, 2003, Plaintiffs Dot-ster, Inc., Go Daddy Software, Inc., and eNom, Incorporated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. On September 15, 2003, Defendant Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN” or “Defendant”) filed its Opposition. On September 22, 2003, Plaintiffs filed a Reply. The Motion came regularly for hearing on October 20, 2003. After hearing oral argument on the Motion, the Court took the matter under…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Sammartano v. First Judicial District Court, in and for the County of Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vizer v. vizernews.comDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- American Promotional Events, Inc.—Northwest v. City & County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Del Monte International Gmbh v. Del Monte Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Novedades Y Servicios, Inc. v. Financial Crimes Enforcement NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
- Terrier, LLC v. HCAFranchise CorporationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022