Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Kirby

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 1, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUSANO, Judge.

Ollie M. Kirby seeks to “correct” an alleged error in an agreed order entered in 1985. Her motion, filed pursuant to Rule 60.02, Tenn.R.CivJP., was denied by the trial court. She appealed, arguing that the *604agreed order is “inconsistent with the [trial court’s] previous finding and inconsistent with [her] understanding.” We affirm.

I

This litigation was commenced in 1983 when several individuals filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against the movant, her now-deceased husband, Aaron Kirby, and others. As pertinent here, that suit asked the court to determine the owner…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Underwood v. Zurich Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Banks v. Dement Const. Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Thompson v. Firemen's Fund Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Brown v. Consolidation Coal CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Wooley v. Gould, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Christopher Furlough v. Spherion Atlantic Workforce, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Holiday v. Shoney's South, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  3. Doyle S. Silliman v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  4. Antonius Harris v. Tennessee Rehabilitative Initiative In CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  5. James W. Burd v. Daeshawn Traughber a/k/a Daeshawn SouzaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API