Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Shames

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 7, 2019No. AC41412PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoll, J.

The plaintiff, Glenn Gilman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his action against the defendants Brian Shames, M.D., and the state of Connecticut (state). 1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court erred in concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his bystander emotional distress claims on the grounds that (1) his claim against Shames, to the extent that the plaintiff was suing Shames in his individual capacity, was barred by statutory immunity pursuant to General Statutes § 4-165, and (2) his claim against the state was derivative of a wrongful…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Dumond v. DenehySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Jacoby v. BrinckerhoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Mercer v. RodriquezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 360 M.S.R. Associates, LLC v. 350 Main Street Middletown, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
  2. Gilman v. ShamesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  3. Pileggi v. MathiasDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API