Legal Opinion

Craft v. South Carolina Commission for Blind

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 3, 2009No. 4628PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHearn, C.J.

Mark Craft contends the trial court erred in finding he did not demonstrate the elements necessary to recover under a theory of promissory estoppel. We affirm.

FACTS

Craft received a vending license from the South Carolina Commission for the Blind (Commission) in 1981 and began working as a blind licensed vendor (vendor) in Florence that same year. 1 Craft,, who has lived with his mother his entire life, continued to work as a vendor in Florence until he and his mother moved to Anderson in 1991. Thereafter, Craft accepted successive positions as a vendor at a welcome center in Fair Play, a rest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. McCall v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Davis v. Greenwood School District 50Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Doe v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Atlantic Group, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
  2. Barnes v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
  3. Basilides Cruz v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022
  4. Gentry v. Bioverativ US LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
  5. T-Zone Health Inc v. SouthStar Capital LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API