Craft v. South Carolina Commission for Blind
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHearn, C.J.
Mark Craft contends the trial court erred in finding he did not demonstrate the elements necessary to recover under a theory of promissory estoppel. We affirm.
FACTS
Craft received a vending license from the South Carolina Commission for the Blind (Commission) in 1981 and began working as a blind licensed vendor (vendor) in Florence that same year. 1 Craft,, who has lived with his mother his entire life, continued to work as a vendor in Florence until he and his mother moved to Anderson in 1991. Thereafter, Craft accepted successive positions as a vendor at a welcome center in Fair Play, a rest…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Tiger, Inc. Ex Rel. Green Apple Partnership v. Fisher Agro, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- McCall v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Davis v. Greenwood School District 50Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Doe v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Anthony v. Atlantic Group, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Barnes v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Basilides Cruz v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022
- Gentry v. Bioverativ US LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
- T-Zone Health Inc v. SouthStar Capital LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.