Committee Against MRT v. Public Utilities Commission

'• .Sweeney; J.

The only issue to be resolved in this appeal is whether appellants were provided proper notice of the proceedings initiated by Cincinnati Bell before the commission. .

B. C. 4909.18 provides that, unless otherwise ordered by the commission, the public .utility must file, along with its application to the commission, “[a] proposed notice for newspaper publication fully disclosing the substance of the application. 5 ’ And, irrespective of whether the utility is required to file such notice with the commission, B. C. 4909.19 provides that the utility must publish once a week for…