Legal Opinion

Beach v. Beach Hotel Corporation

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 4, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court made in the course of a receivership action wherein a receiver was appointed for the defendant. The general situation out of which the present controversy arose is in part set forth in Wark Co. v. Beach Hotel Corporation, 113 Conn. 119, 154 Atl. 252. Erancis E. Beach, owning a piece of property in Bridgeport, entered into an agreement with the Development Service Corporation for the construction of a hotel upon it and the organization of a corporation to lease and operate the hotel. The defendant was organized and a lease of the premises…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Comer v. SheehanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Burke v. WillardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Reed v. BartlettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881
  5. Wark Co. v. Beach Hotel CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford Realization Co. v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Arcuri v. WeissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Beach v. Beach Hotel CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. First Federal Bank, FSB v. Whitney Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Van SickleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API