Legal Opinion

Olson v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 9, 1983No. 20-281; CA A25291PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a trial court judgment dismissing her fourth amended complaint for failure to state ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim for relief. Plaintiff, owner of a charter fishing service, seeks damages from defendant, a public utility, 1 for its alleged failure to repair and furnish adequate telephone service, as required by ORS 757.020, 2 particularly after repeated notification of inadequate service was given to defendant. Plaintiff alleges that, as a result of defendant’s failure, she suffered loss of income from fishing charters in the amount of $43,500, as well…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williamson v. McKennaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Cutsforth v. KINZUA CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Invenchek, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Garrison v. Pacific Northwest BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Hill v. GarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. GTE Northwest, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1999
  2. National Union Insurance v. Puget Sound Power & LightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. Adamson v. WorldCom Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Simpson v. Phone Directories Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Great Northern Insurance Company v. Crown Pine Timber 4District Court, D. Oregon · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API