Legal Opinion
State v. Holmes
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 12, 2004No. 50752-4-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
93 P.3d 212 (2004)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Donald HOLMES, Appellant.
No. 50752-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
July 12, 2004.
E. Bradford Bales, King Co. Pros. Atty. Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
David Bruce Koch, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
BECKER, J.
A jury convicted Donald Holmes of child rape and child molestation. During the trial, a detective testified that Holmes did not "appear surprised" when arrested, and Holmes did not deny the allegation of sexual abuse as the detective "would normally expect to see."[1] We agree with Holmes that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Alton R. FairchildCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. Ramon G. GonzalezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State Of Washington v. Ricardo Ramirez DiazCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.