Legal Opinion

State v. Knapp

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 27, 2009No. 36098-5-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

199 P.3d 505 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Kyle Cameron KNAPP, Appellant.

No. 36098-5-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

January 27, 2009.

Kathryn A. Russell Selk, Russell Selk Law Office, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Kathleen Proctor, Pierce County Prosecuting Atty. Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.

BRIDGEWATER, J.

¶ 1 Kyle Cameron Knapp appeals his conviction for residential burglary. We hold that the State committed prosecutorial misconduct by commenting in its closing argument on Knapp's silence. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

¶ 2 On November 14, 2006, Darren…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. PinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State Of Washington v. Mahdi Elisah SharrieffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. State Of Washington v. Richard Bruce, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. State Of Washington, V Adrian Troy Abram, IIICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API