Papianni v. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The circumstances of this case do not reflect favorably upon the conduct of the union here involved. It has systematically denied rights and opportunities to its own members apparently to protect a favored group within its ranks. Furthermore, it has consistently and blithely ignored prior court rulings and seeks here to reargue many which have already been determined against it. It is difficult for the court and certainly for the plaintiffs to understand why a union would treat its own members in such a cavalier fashion. Rather than representing the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Harrigan v. Caneel Bay, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1990
- Solis v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Merk v. Jewel Food Stores Div.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Anderson v. Eneral Motors, Boxwood Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19804District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.