Legal Opinion
Maier v. Arsenault
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 27, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIifGLis, C.J.
On July 23,1951, the defendant agreed by a bond for a deed that, on or before September 15, 1951, and upon the payment of the agreed purchase price, he would convey by warranty deed to the plaintiffs the real property owned by him on Greenwood Drive in Manchester. At the time the agree ment was executed there was a dwelling house in-process of construction on the land in question. The-agreement contained this provision: “The said Arsenault agrees to have said premises ready for occupancy on or before date of delivery of deed, with a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Town of Manchester.”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- W. G. Maltby, Inc. v. Associated Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Gray v. GreenblattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Mazzotta v. BornsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Trumbull Electric Manufacturing Co. v. John Cooke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Jay Realty, Inc. v. Ahearn Development CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Cody v. Remington Electric ShaversSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Ruscito v. F-Dyne Electronics Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Kronholm v. KronholmConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.