Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ward v. System Auto Parks & Garages, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided March 28, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 9207Published

1DissentSwain, J.

I dissent. The failure of the plaintiff to file an affidavit under Code of Civil Procedure, section 448, admits only that the copy of the parking ticket alleged in the answer is a correct and genuine copy of the one issued to the plaintiff by the defendant. It does not admit its legal effect or that it is a contract. “The cases in which section 448 has been construed are numerous. The result reached may be briefly stated as follows: Where the defendant has pleaded a written instrument in defense (not by way of cross-complaint), and the plaintiff has not served and filed an affidavit denying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Sandler v. Commonwealth Station Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Merrill v. Pacific Transfer Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. U Drive & Tour, Ltd. v. System Auto Parks, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1937
  5. Oswald v. Northrop Aircraft, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API