Legal Opinion

Dreher v. Connolly

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 7, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from fourth district court. Action by Henry B. Dreher against Patrick Connolly and Patrick Mahony for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Notwithstanding the positive denial by the defendants of the purchase of the merchandise for the recovery of the value of which this action was brought, there appears, from the examination of the evidence, sufficient to sustain a finding that at the time of the sale and delivery the defendants were the owners of the saloon at 310 Bowery, at which, and for the use of which, the merchandise was delivered, and that, by permitting their firm name to be continued after the premises had passed into the possession of McGonigle without any indication of change of ownership, the plaintiff’s assignor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fixman v. BrownNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bloomingdale v. AdlerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  2. Garbett v. GedneyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1896
  3. In re the Rochester, Hornellsville & Lackawanna RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Jarrard v. BissellNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Tobias v. WierckNew York Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API