In re the Rochester, Hornellsville & Lackawanna Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from several orders of the special term in proceedings for the condemnation of land, under the general railroad act.
1Opinion of the CourtDwight, J.
Of the four appeals, the first is said to have "been taken only pro forma; the second raises the question of the necessity or propriety of bringing in the receiver of the petitioner, appointed since the proceedings were commenced, as a party to the proceedings ; the third is from an order denying the appellant’s motion for leave to file an answer, after an award and an order on appeal for a rehearing; and the fourth is from an order appointing commissioners for such rehearing. The third appeal presents the principal question in the case.
*?The facts are as follows : Charles Hartshorn, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Thompson v. . SimpsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Speir v. . Town of New UtrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Place v. . HaywardNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Lowery v. . ErskineNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.