Legal Opinion

Jarrard v. Bissell

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1889Published

Appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtLandon, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover the balance upon the contract price for freight of a cargo of potatoes received by him from the defendants upon his canal boat at *10Port Jackson, Clinton county, and transported to New York, and delivered to the defendant’s consignee there. The case was tried by the court without a jury. The main question was whether the plaintiff delivered all the potatoes he received. The court made allowance for shrinkage, and found that be delivered fifty-six barrels less than he received, and charged him with the value thereof. The testimony is not as satisfactory as to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Shoemaker v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Dreher v. ConnollyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  4. Durfee v. BumpNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. People v. . TannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API