Yeager v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Petitioner was convicted by a jury of first degree sodomy. He sought post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, because his trial counsel failed to present corroborating evidence of non-access to the victim during part of the period in question. The post-conviction court denied relief. We affirm.
The indictment alleged that petitioner sodomized his step-daughter between July 1 and September 1, 1982. Petitioner was indicted June 3, 1985. Relying on a Statute of Limitations defense, he admitted sexual contact with the victim, but contended that the contact was more than…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Tarwater v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Miotke v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Howe v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Dotta v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Ashley v. HoytCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Temple v. ZenonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Davis v. ArmenakisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.