Legal Opinion
Murphy v. East Akron Community House
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1989No. 14208PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, P.J.
In this age and race discrimination case, plaintiff-appellant, Goldie M. Murphy, appeals the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of East Akron Community House (“EACH”), East Akron Neighborhood Development Corporation (“EANDC”), and Cazzell Smith. We affirm.
EACH is an Ohio nonprofit corporation which provides housing services and other community assistance. EACH is funded primarüy by charitable donations and money from government. EANDC is also an Ohio nonprofit corporation which provides neighborhood rehabilitation and development assistance. EACH and EANDC are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Charles LaGRANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GULF & WESTERN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Chappell v. GTE Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Robert I. RIDENOUR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the LAWSON COMPANY, a Consolidated Foods Company, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brockman v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- DeSanzo v. Titanium Metals Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Cassel v. Schuster Electronics, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Robinson v. Vanex Tube Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.