Legal Opinion

Fahnestock v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 6, 1951No. 49243Published

1Opinion of the Court

95 F.Supp. 232 (1951)

FAHNESTOCK et al.

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 49243.

United States Court of Claims.

February 6, 1951.

John J. Costello, New York City, for plaintiffs. Rathbone, Perry, Kelley & Drye, and Messrs. Theodore Pearson and Arthur W. Siegrist, all of New York City, were on the briefs.

Elizabeth B. Davis, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Theron Lamar Caudle, for defendant. Andrew D. Sharpe and Ellis N. Slack, Washington, D. C., were on the brief.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and LITTLETON, WHITAKER, MADDEN and HOWELL, Judges.

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiffs, executors of the will of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fahnestock v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  3. Pearson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  4. Pearson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  5. Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API