Pearson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
The only question in this case is whether section 325 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 87) is applicable to the overpayment of $321,933.63 in respect of tax paid by the estate of Frederick F; Ayer. That section provides as follows : “Any tax that has been paid under the provisions of Title III of the Revenue Act of 1924 prior to the enactment of this Act in excess of the tax imposed by such title as amended *1019by this Act shall be refunded without interest”
June 8, 1925, the estate of Ayer filed a return showing an estate tax of $2,370,-953.38 computed in accordance with the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sunny Brook Distillery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
- Fahnestock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Fahnestock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951