Legal Opinion

Pearson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 1, 1936No. 41837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The only question in this case is whether section 325 of the Revenue Act of 1926 (44 Stat. 87) is applicable to the overpayment of $321,933.63 in respect of tax paid by the estate of Frederick F; Ayer. That section provides as follows : “Any tax that has been paid under the provisions of Title III of the Revenue Act of 1924 prior to the enactment of this Act in excess of the tax imposed by such title as amended *1019by this Act shall be refunded without interest”

June 8, 1925, the estate of Ayer filed a return showing an estate tax of $2,370,-953.38 computed in accordance with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sunny Brook Distillery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  2. Fahnestock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. Fahnestock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API