Pearson v. United States

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a second motion for a new trial and additional findings of fact.

In the last sentence of finding 10 of the findings of fact promulgated by the court June 1, 1936, the amount “$485,327.-15” stated therein is changed to read $485,-427.15. This was a typographical error and does not change the amount of the tax involved nor the result reached in the opinion.

The motion for further amendments of facts is denied. Plaintiff’s original argument and its argument in the first and second motion for a new trial are based, we think, upon the erroneous premise that…