Legal Opinion
Herby Berryhill and Lucille Berryhill v. Rich Plan of Pensacola, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 11, 1978No. 76-3046PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge:
In this case, we affirm the district court’s finding that Herby and Lucille Berryhill are entitled to recover statutory penalties as well as attorney’s fees from Rich Plan of Pensacola for Rich Plan’s violation of the Truth-In-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1605(a) (1976) ; Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.4(a) (1977) ;1 and the Alabama Consumer Finance law, Ala.Code tit. 5, §§ 316 and 330 (Supp.1973). We conclude, however, that the district court made an erroneous penalty award for the violation of Alabama law and reduce the judgment accordingly.
I
Rich Plan of Pensacola (Rich…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jordan v. Group Health Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Transportation Guarantee Co. v. JellinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Georgia Power Co. v. 54.20 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Mr. And Mrs. Archie Davis, Cross v. United Companies Mortgage and Investment of Gretna, Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Kriger v. European Health Spa, Inc., of Milwaukee, Wis.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Veale v. CITIBANK, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- People v. JTH Tax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Thompson v. 10,000 RV Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Williams v. Public Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Thomas v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.